|
\ GREYBULL RIVER
SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY Landscape Taphonomy
Click above to return to |
||
|
Landscape is defined here as resulting from a complex, evolving, and integrated set of cultural, biological, climatological, chemical and geological processes. Landscape taphonomy investigates the the processes by which these interactions are interpreted over multiple time scales. |
||
|
Figure 1. Landscape taphonomy model (click on thumbnail for larger image). |
This model guides development of the GRSLE project in several ways: · Landscapes are complex formational mosaics that cannot be seen exclusively as cultural, biological, or physical entities. · Non-trivial landscape research, regardless of its ultimate goals – whether archaeology, geological, or biological – must incorporate aspects of each of the major contributory realms. · Landscape properties are constantly in flux at multiple spatial and temporal scales and require continuous monitoring. · Methods to research landscapes must be collaboratively developed with significant inputs from disciplines based in the social, biological, and physical sciences. Combining these perspectives from landscape taphonomy can provide baseline datasets, monitor landscape change, and span many of the gaps that need to be closed between social and natural sciences to provide a unified approach to biological, heritage, and physical resources. This is best described as archaeological ecology, since it’s ultimate goal is to investigate long-term ecosystem processes in relationship to human actions, impacts, and responses. This approach is essential to realize the suggestions that long-term preservation of resources must be based on an iterative process of problem identification, response design and implementation, followed by monitoring, assessment, and response re-design. We envision GRSLE archaeological ecology as a valuable contributions to this adaptive management process at several levels: first, as providers of baseline data; second, as providing expertise in multidisciplinary project design and implementation, and finally by setting the stage for long-term bundled monitoring programs. Although the proximate goals of this project are to understand human impacts along portions of a single river drainage, one of the ultimate broader impacts of GRSLE may be to provide a realistic evaluation of adaptive management feasibility across Federal (USDA Forest Service, and USDI BLM), State, and private landholdings.
|
|